Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
 

Register · Log In
HomeGuideID RequestRecentFrassForumsDonateHelp
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Registration is open for the 2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho July 24-27

Moth submissions from National Moth Week 2023

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29


Previous events
TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Home » Guide » Arthropods (Arthropoda) » Hexapods (Hexapoda) » Insects (Insecta) » Beetles (Coleoptera) » Polyphaga » Series Cucujiformia » Longhorn and Leaf Beetles (Chrysomeloidea) » Leaf Beetles (Chrysomelidae) » Case-bearing Leaf Beetles (Cryptocephalinae) » Cryptocephalini » Cryptocephalina » Cryptocephalus » Arizonensis group (Cryptocephalus Arizonensis group) » Cryptocephalus sanguinicollis » Cryptocephalus sanguinicollis sanguinicollis
Photo#263867
Red & Black Casebearer in California - Cryptocephalus sanguinicollis
Copyright © 2009 Harsi S. Parker

Red & Black Casebearer in California - Cryptocephalus sanguinicollis
Webb Canyon, ~2000 ft. altitude, Los Angeles County, California, USA
April 5, 2009
Size: ~4 mm
Another pool rescue with a happy ending -- this one seemed none the worse for wear and flew off after its wings dried out a bit. After looking through my possible beetle options, I think this one looks most like one of the the Casebearers (Subfamily Cryptocephalinae) -- perhaps one of the members of Genus Cryptocephalus? I believe this group is characterized by the base of the pronotum being as wide as the elytra... Of the species listed in the guide, I couldn't find any patterns that matched up with mine, but The California Beetle Database lists 12 species in this genus and BugGuide currently only has images for 2 of those species.

I have MANY more photos of this specimen which I may post later, but I simply couldn't wait to find out more about this little one! Anxiously waiting to hear whether my guesses are right and if it is possible to obtain a species ID...

Specimen photographed in the shade -- much shinier and red more vivid in the sunlight. Mixed oak & chaparral habitat.
tag · login or register to post comments
Contributed by Harsi S. Parker on 6 April, 2009 - 1:05pm
Last updated 22 December, 2017 - 12:53pm

C. sanguinicollis sanguinicollis confirmed!
Due to the extraordinary efforts of Hartmut Wisch, this image has now been confirmed by several experts. My most sincere thanks to Hartmut for going the extra mile for me on this one, and also to Michael C. Thomas for his initial call.
… Harsi S. Parker, 13 April, 2009 - 8:16pm login or register to post comments

Moved
Moved from Cryptocephalus sanguinicollis.
… Harsi S. Parker, 13 April, 2009 - 7:50pm login or register to post comments

Edit to original post...
I corrected the number of species that I had stated The CA Beetle Project lists for Cryptocephalus. (I was counting subspecies by mistake...Oops!) Also, I have been able to rule out two more of those possible choices based on images showing color/pattern -- C. confluentus and C. alterans -- which now leaves 8 unknown possibilities from California remaining.
… Harsi S. Parker, 6 April, 2009 - 1:56pm login or register to post comments

 
Try
Cryptocephaus s. sanguinicollis Suffrian. It's the right color and occurs in California.
… Michael C. Thomas, 6 April, 2009 - 3:39pm login or register to post comments

 
Thank you so much, Michael!
On your suggestion, I was able to find this species page, which definitely looks and reads as though it is a match. It does not mention this species being recorded in my county, but we are technically in an unincorporated area and one of the counties they do list (San Bernardino) is only five or so miles from my location.

Do you think I should feel confident enough to go ahead and create a new species page for this? Or is it perhaps best to try and get a local expert to confirm first?

Once again, thank you very much for your assistance with this!
… Harsi S. Parker, 7 April, 2009 - 12:03am login or register to post comments

 
I wouldn't
place too much importance on that kind of distributional detail in most cases. Many species are far more widely distributed than records indicate. There's only so many of us compared to how many insects? I don't know who's at the Los Angeles County Museum any more but you might want to run it by there and check.
… Michael C. Thomas, 7 April, 2009 - 10:44am login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.

Disclaimer: Dedicated naturalists volunteer their time and resources here to provide this service. We strive to provide accurate information, but we are mostly just amateurs attempting to make sense of a diverse natural world. If you need expert professional advice, contact your local extension office.

Contributors own the copyright to and are solely responsible for contributed content.
Click the contributor's name for licensing and usage information.
Everything else copyright © 2003-2024 Iowa State University, unless otherwise noted.

Bugguide is hosted by:

Plant Pathology, Entomology and Microbiology at Iowa State University logo

Printer Friendly Version 		Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
Site Map
Contact