Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#265502
Dufourea on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male

Dufourea on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - Male
Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, San Diego County, California, USA
March 27, 2005
Size: 11 mm
We saw this bee and several others in Sentenac Cienega in Barrel Cactus. Each of the everal cactus flowers had one of these bee in or around in. The bee would nestle in pollen or on the side of the petals, take off for a few patrols over the barrel, then lands in the blossom again and stays for a while. This seemed to be definitely male behavior. The first photo is of a male. I am not positive that all three photos are of the exact same bee.
The bee has two cells and arolia are present. When we looked up host plants, we found at least one megachile, Ashmeadiella opuntiae, that is considered as probably restricted in its pollen collecting to cactus flowers. But I know nothing else of this bee.

UPDATE: I think I may have identified this bee to species. Very few bees collect pollen from Desert Barrel Cactus (Ferocactus cylindraceus, previously F. acanthodes), and these male bees were hanging around these barrels in bloom. When I checked my field notes, we noted males diving down into the cluster of stamens; one male actually came up with a female. And so I checked in Krombein et al for Barrel Cactus as a host plant. No Dufourea were listed under either name. And so I checked for synonyms--and found Echinocactus cylindraceus was the original name given to the plant by Engelman. Under this name, among the few bees listed was one Dufourea, #1935: D. echinocacti Timberlake 1939, listed as an apparent oligolege of Echinocactus including E. acanthodes, E. cylindraceus.

In Timberlake, 1939, New species of bees of the genus Dufourea from California, Annals Ent. Soc. of America, XXXII: p. 399-400 is the original description based on 4 specimens, 3 males from Palm Canyon, Riverside Co, and 1 female from a site now in Anza-Borrego maybe 25 miles east of where we saw our bees. Size of males was 9.5 mm, close to our approximate 11 mm. The two traits Timberlake especially points out are the dilated subtriangular front basitarsi and the strongly depressed head which is longer than wide. One of the image shows the head depression, and the last image I just posted, #486631, shows the triangular basitarsi. I think it is very likely that this bee is D echinocacti.

Images of this individual: tag all
Dufourea on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male Halictidae, Rophitini male on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male Halictidae, Rophitini male face on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male Halictidae, Rophitini on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male Halictidae, Rophitini on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male Halictidae, Rophitini on Barrel Cactus 27 Mar 2005 Sentenac Cienega - Dufourea echinocacti - male

Moved
Moved from Rophitinae.

 
Dufourea echinocacti
Thanks so much, John, for moving this unusual bee. I really appreciate your confirmation.

a better image found
I just posted image # 293513, which to me seems the best of all the images in showing mid and hind legs, abdomen and mandibles. I plan to compare it with the Xeralictus in the CU Museum Entomology Collection on Friday.

 
Rophitinae
Please click to the last picture, #293513, for comments on the CU Museum and Library visit.

Rophitini
Halictidae

three submarginal cells are clearly visible in the photo

please post more photos

 
Dufourea with two different wing patterns.
This bee, identified as a Rophitinae male, has one wing with three cells, one wing with two cells. The crucial factor was that it is a Rophitinae. The dilemma is that in Michener's Bees of the World, 2000, the "Key to the Genera of the Rophininae of the Western Hemisphere," the first determination is whether it is two-celled or three-celled. I wrote to Dr. Michener asking him which number of marginal cells I should consider.

He kindly answered me that this bee is a Dufourea and added: "if is surprising that it has three submarginal cells on one side, but I do have the impression that the crossvein that causes this is weaker than nearby veins. There are a few Eurasian species of Dufourea that really have three submarginal cells; they have been put in a genus or subgenus Trilia, not now recognized as distinct from Dufourea. None of the American species, however, regularly have three submarginal cells."

Now that the genus is known, I think I have identified the species. Please see the UPDATE commentary under the photo above.

 
submarginal cells
We blew up those three cells in photoshop and finally decided that it was the underwing the was causing the curve that looked like the 3rd cell. It was a tough call, though. The second photo, which as I said, may not be of the same bee, shows only two. However, the legs seem similar. All black insects just don't show detail.

 
this bee seems to have anomalous wing veins
"The second photo, which as I said, may not be of the same bee, shows only two"

No, both images clearly shows three submarginal cells in the left wing and two in the right wing, so it must be the same individual.

"it was the underwing the was causing the curve that looked like the 3rd cell"

No, in both images the underwing is faintly visible in a different position. Also, the underwing would not show the same illusion in two photos.

This must be a rophitine of one of the three-celled genera with loss of a crossvein in the right wing.

The large reported size is consistent with Xeralictus timberlakei.

An interesting webpage on Xeralictus:
http://entmuseum.ucr.edu/bug_spotlight/posted%20Images-pages/33.htm

 
Webpage on Xeralictus
Thanks so much for bringing this webpage to my attention. This spring we did not see any Xeralictus bees, but we were able to observe Hesperapis on Mentzelia in considerable detail. In studying them, I went back to this webpage about plant mimicry and plant trickery. To my amazement, I realized that we had seen exactly the same behavior in our Hesperapis. I would like to post the narrative, but it takes three photos which happen to be of different individuals at different dates. To post each photo separately would ruin the narrative. Please advise.

 
Xiralictus possibly
Thanks so much for all the information. I checked Krombein et al and see that X. timberlaki is an oligolege of Mentzelia involucrata. I checked out the website you gave me with M. involucrata and its mimic Mohavea confertiflora. I know both these flowers! Both occur in Anza-Borrego, where rocky slope meets desert floor. We have seen these flowers in Borrego Valley--but never in the Scissors Crossing area where we saw these bees. The terrain was very similar, though. I checked the San Diego flora and both flowers could occur where we saw these bees.

I checked the CU Museum entomology collection, which is on line, and it has a specimen of each of the two species of Xeralictus, though I don't know if male or female. On our next visit there in about a month or so we will bring our photos and try to check them out feature for feature.

It's very exciting to think we may have this bee. Thanks so much for all your help. We appreciate it so very much.

 
it is a really interesting discovery
thanks for posting these photos

Note spelling: Xeralictus = xeric Halictus

I don't think this is a Xeralictus so am not sure what it is

 
A better image found
I just posted what I think is the best image of this bee, #293513. It shows a lot more than the other photos. On Friday we plan to visit the CU Museum Entomology Collection, where I will try to check out this bee trait by trait with their Xeralictus.

 
Another image
I posted the last image we have of this bee, though I don't think it shows anything new. We'll be on the lookout for this bee again, and maybe will be able to get more diagnostic pictures.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.