Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#265534
False Blister Beetle - Rhinoplatia ruficollis

False Blister Beetle - Rhinoplatia ruficollis
Desert Hot Springs, Riverside County, California, USA
April 7, 2009
ID from comparing images in the guide.

Images of this individual: tag all
False Blister Beetle - Rhinoplatia ruficollis False Blister Beetle - Rhinoplatia ruficollis

thanks a ton, Hartmut!
Moved from Rhinoplatia.

 
Thank you, Vassili,
for all of your great, untiring work!

Rhinoplatia -- but which one?
Rh. ruficollis Horn must be more common but the type differs from your beetle in head color (var.?) and vestiture; another option is Rh. mortivallicola Arnett, of which i know nothing.

Moved from False Blister Beetles.

 
Quite sure this is R. ruficollis -
The Harvard MCZ specimen is rather worn, and shows the dark ground color of the elytra. Fresh specimens, like Lynette's (and I'm about to post some photos as well) are entirely clothed in a somewhat dense, griseous pubescence. The head may be entirely black or, as seen here, with the apical half reddish-orange. Please see the INFO page for more, including references. Also, there are records for the neighboring Palm Springs area.
R. mortivallicola is known only from the Death Valley Region. That beetle can be distinguished from ruficollis by the longer, and narrower thorax, shiny and devoid of pubescence, its entirely reddish-orange head, and sparse black pubescence at the subapex.

 
Thanks V
It's certainly a neat looking beetle.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.