Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

National Moth Week was July 23-31, 2022! See moth submissions.

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Previous events

Mordellistena sexnotata Dury - Mordellistena sexnotata

Mordellistena sexnotata Dury - Mordellistena sexnotata
Emma Long Metropolitan Park, Austin, Travis County, Texas, USA
May 22, 2009
Det. T. R. Moyer, 2009

coll'ed via beating/sweeping

spmn in the TAMUIC


Mordellistena sexnotata
Finally, an easy Mordellidae to determine - M. sexnotata Dury, 1902. See the MCZ image under M. festiva Fall, 1907 MCZ type. Ridge formula is 2,2,1. Liljeblad(1) only saw two - Ky and NV.

Beautiful beetle! And another new species for BugGuide :)

Mordellistena trifasciata (Say) ??
I feel the need to question this det. See remarks comments in sp. page.

to lump or not
Well these two "species" both have the same ridge counts and shapes, and largely the same (and virtually unique) color pattern. Liljeblad separates them by "M. trifasciata always has the elytra terminating with black whereas M. sexnotata always requires a pale apex", so this ones does key to M. sexnotata.

But as we discussed with other tumblers, much of the family, and certainly this tribe, seems poorly defined, with many seemingly similar "species", based on small samples (apprently only 2 or 3 in the case of M. sexnotata). Wish we knew if Dr. Jackman had revised his own unpublished thoughts on the validity of M. sexnotata. I received at least one correspondance from him expressing a nominclature difference which he certainly believed but had yet to publish ( here's at least the third determination by Dr. Jackman that seems like perhaps he was thinking of a "species pair" (same ridges/counts again too)). I'll try to contact some professionals working this family to see if there's more accurate keys / species lists, published or not.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.