Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Beetles (Coleoptera)
»
Polyphaga
»
Series Cucujiformia
»
Coccinelloidea
»
Coccinellid group
»
Lady Beetles (Coccinellidae)
»
Coccinellinae
»
Hippodamia
»
Five-spotted Lady Beetle (Hippodamia quinquesignata)
»
Hippodamia quinquesignata quinquesignata
Photo#292185
Copyright © 2009
James Bailey
Mountain Ladybird -
Hippodamia quinquesignata
Columbia Icefields, Jasper NP, Alberta, Canada
June 21, 2009
Elevation: 2100m~ above sea level. Found on sign in Columbia Icefields.
Currently researching identity.
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
James Bailey
on 22 June, 2009 - 11:45am
Last updated 20 November, 2015 - 3:32pm
Moved
Moved from
Hippodamia glacialis
.
…
Abigail Parker
, 12 October, 2009 - 9:18am
login
or
register
to post comments
how about H. quiquesignata?
This looks exactly, I mean
exactly
, like Figure 127 in Chapin's 1946
Hippodamia
monograph,
(
1
)
which Gordon refers to as his source for most of the
Hippodamia
figures and in fact for much of the
Hippodamia
information in general:
"The genus was revised by Chapin (1946) and I have essentially followed his classification except for the elimination of a few subspecific names and the addition of a key to species" p. 706
"Chapin also included illustrations of almost all the dorsal color variations of species of Hippodamia; and his paper should be consulted for these because I have included only illustrations of the basic patterns." - p. 707
None of Chapin's illustrations of any subspecies of
H. glacialis
(plate 12), including the nominate subspecies, look like this individual. I'm not sure what Gordon based his Fig. 599 (c) image of
H. g. lecontei
on - which does look very much like this individual - there's nothing very like it in Chapin's figures of that subspecies.
But, now that I've gone on and on about what it isn't, I'll reiterate that this individual is a perfect match for Chapin's first illustration of
H. quinquesignata
- the nominate subspecies, in fact - and the range also matches.
…
Abigail Parker
, 8 October, 2009 - 7:21am
login
or
register
to post comments
I'm ok with that
It fits Gordon's range map better. And if we went with the statement that they are externally inseparable, then I suppose we can't be "wrong" here either.
…
Tim Moyer
, 8 October, 2009 - 10:02pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Hippodamia moesta bowditchi
.
Response posted on your H. sinuata as requested.
…
Tim Moyer
, 19 August, 2009 - 8:19pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Ladybird Beetles
.
…
v belov
, 3 July, 2009 - 9:18pm
login
or
register
to post comments
size?
appears to be either Hippodamia oregonensis (4-5mm) or H. moesta bowditchi (6-7.5mm). I'd lean toward bowditchi, given the completely black posterior lateral pronotal margin. But it sounds like H. oregonesis is found a bit further north (into Banff NP) than H. m. bowditchi. Both can have the traces of convergent spots just visible on yours. Very nice lady!
…
Tim Moyer
, 2 July, 2009 - 10:03pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Uh
can't really help there. I would compare its size to a 7-spotted ladybird. I had a picture of it on my finger in which it appeared slightly smaller than a picture of a 7-spotted on the same finger a week ago. I really really should keep those shots.
…
James Bailey
, 3 July, 2009 - 5:25am
login
or
register
to post comments
H. m. bowditchi
ok, suggest we go with H. m. bowditchi, as that's what it keyed to originally.
…
Tim Moyer
, 3 July, 2009 - 9:04pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Question
I have recieved an e-mail recently by someone who is certain this is either the 5-spot or the Glacial ladybird. I sent this e-mail before I posted it on here. He says its impossible to tell without dissection.
…
James Bailey
, 12 August, 2009 - 10:54pm
login
or
register
to post comments
re-key
Ok, I re-ran this one through Gordon's key, and while it appears to still key well to H. moesta bowditchi, it really doesn't match Gordon's figures for that species/subspecies as well as it matches H. glacials lecontei. So I'll agree this is most likely not H. m. bowditchi.
Gordon's key couplet 23 is a bit confusing to me. Leading to H. glacialis and H. quinquesignata, it states "elytron with maculae reduced, if confluent, only narrowly so (except lecontei in east central CA)". To me, that appears to require light, non-confluent maculae, at least in Alberta. But if we say the cuplet is incorrect, or I'm reading so, then H. glacialis lecontei or H. quinquesignata are possible, and as your friend stated "impossible to tell without dissection" (of a male). However, from Gordon's illustrations, it appears that only H. g. lecontei is anywhere close to the heavy markings seen in this ladybird.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
…
Tim Moyer
, 13 August, 2009 - 10:06pm
login
or
register
to post comments
In case you are intrested
the person who said about this was John Acorn.
…
James Bailey
, 14 August, 2009 - 2:40pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Would you mind checking these for me?
I thought they were H. sinuata but am unsure how to separate them from other H. with any certainty.
…
James Bailey
, 18 August, 2009 - 5:15pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.