Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Information about the 2019 BugGuide Gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#323938
green carabid - Lebia moesta

green carabid - Lebia moesta
Pack Forest, Pierce County, Washington, USA
July 11, 2009
Size: ~6mm
Larger version of this image here.

gathering_2009

Moved tentatively

 
ID confirmed by T.L. Erwin

If truly dull blackish
luster dorsally (no metallic sheen green to blue) then likely Lebia moesta, otherwise consider L. viridis. Specimen examined in hand and under scope might be necessary.

 
larger file
I don't know if it helps at all, but I added a link to a larger version of this image. I didn't keep the specimen and have no other photos.

 
I see no metallic reflections
so your image in my opinion could very well fit black Lebia moesta despite your reported large size estmate of "~6 mm". Almost all L. moesta are under 5 mm while L. viridis with its characteristic metallic sheen (blue to green) reaches 6 mm. Assessing true luster from one photograph can be misleading as you know. Both species are now known to occur in WA.

 
hmmmm
I think I did actually measure the beetle, and the "~" means it was not holding still and it was close to 6 but unlikely less than 5. We may have to leave this at the genus level.

 
Yes, best to stay at genus
until someone expresses a strong opinion on which way to go. For the record, I have many reference specimens of both species and the difference in luster is obvious/constant when dorsal surfaces are examined microscopically. Other morphological differences previously published are unreliable/variable in my experience.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.