Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Information about the 2019 BugGuide Gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Discussion, insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#344412
Young Steatoda grossa Couple - Steatoda grossa - male - female

Young Steatoda grossa Couple - Steatoda grossa - Male Female
Enumclaw, Forested Unincorporated King County, Washington, USA
September 1, 2009
Size: female 4mm; male 6mm
I noticed this couple for the first time outside around midnite back on September 1st. The female appears significantly younger than the male, who is mature, but they have remained paired together and have yet to mate (obviously, since she's not mature yet). I've checked on them every night since 9/1/09. I think the male has put 'dibs' on her and decided to co-habitate and fight off other males until she is ready? Neato. Also, the female is the one in the upper portion of the photo and that is the male's ventral side showing.

Reversed?
It appears to me the male is in the upper part of the image and the female below. Hard to say, though....

 
Nope :)
I just submitted two images of the ventral aspect of the males. It can be easy to confuse them for females if you're not close enough to see for sure. In this particular case, I was close enough to see that it was a male in the lower portion of the photo. The white glare that is directly where an epigynum would be (in a female) is just that, only a glare from my flash. :) Check out these photos of one of my males:

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.