Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Chelicerates (Chelicerata)
»
Arachnids (Arachnida)
»
Spiders (Araneae)
»
True Spiders (Araneomorphae)
»
Entelegynae
»
Wolf Spiders (Lycosidae)
»
Melocosa
»
Melocosa fumosa
Photo#353709
Copyright © 2009
Karen Zimmerman
Spider on scree hill higher elevation -
Melocosa fumosa
On trail up to Sentinel Pass, on scree slope leading up Temple Mountain, Above Larch Valley, which is above Moraine Lake, Alberta, Canada
September 25, 2009
Size: seemed big!
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Karen Zimmerman
on 21 November, 2009 - 11:22am
Last updated 16 January, 2012 - 12:55am
Moved
Moved from
Spiders
.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 1 December, 2009 - 8:55am
login
or
register
to post comments
Rod Crawford to the rescue!
I sent
Rod Crawford
, our local expert, a link to this photo. It's difficult to tell much from this photo, but he did say this:
(1st reply)--"The overall appearance is rather lycosid-like, but what little I can
make out of the eyes from the online version, doesn't confirm it. The
rear lateral eyes aren't far enough back on the carapace. However, the
photo isn't quite high-res enough for me to be sure of that.
A reasonably likely wolf spider to find in that situation would be
Melocosa fumosa
:
http://www.canadianarachnology.org/data/spiders/18459
"
(2nd reply)--"Stop the presses, the specimen might actually be a
Melocosa
.
Finding no online photos of the genus, I got out a specimen and it turns out
that this particular genus has a rather unusual eye configuration.
However, I still can't be sure from this photo - I'd need something
where the individual eyes appear a little more definitely - in the
online version, the possible eye locations are only 3 or 4 pixels
each... RC"
---------------------------------------------------------------
(This is Mandy speaking now, haha) The photo of
Melocosa fumosa
, the only species of the genus I believe, looks very similar to Karen's spider. I wonder if Lynette (or whoever usually does it) could start a guide page for
Melocosa
(a
Lycosid
) while we're thinking about it?
…
Mandy Howe
, 30 November, 2009 - 10:29pm
login
or
register
to post comments
To Karen Zimmerman
You don't have an email address listed, but I was hoping to contact you about getting an original (bigger/better) sized version of your spider photo so that Rod Crawford can look at it. He may be able to see the eyes better and help get it identified. If you would rather not have your email address publicly displayed here, feel free to contact me, Mandy, at upsara_8159[at]hotmail[dot]com
…
Mandy Howe
, 30 November, 2009 - 10:49pm
login
or
register
to post comments
email address
Hi Mandy,
I am happy to send the original, though, I am embarrassed to say none of them came out really clear....it was a really bright sunny day and my preview on the camera looked good at the time.
aloes-on-my-mind@ca.rr.com
all the best,
kz
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 1 December, 2009 - 11:43pm
login
or
register
to post comments
To Karen
Actually, Rod Crawford figured out the ID of your spider last night based on a cropped image that Lynette made, so we don't need a copy of the original anymore. Your spider was a
Melocosa fumosa
. A wolf spider in a genus that Bug Guide didn't have a record of yet. I don't know how you feel about that... I know that most Bug Guide users add their 'new state records' to their user page under the bibliography section in order to keep track of them and sort of show them off, too. :) I have yet to earn my first state record yet. Congrats on yours!
…
Mandy Howe
, 2 December, 2009 - 12:42am
login
or
register
to post comments
State record
Is that what they're using for state records? I thought it was the first time that bug had been recorded by anyone in that state? In this case this wouldn't be a state record.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 2 December, 2009 - 9:59am
login
or
register
to post comments
Oh?
I guess I thought it was according to Bug Guide. Like if they were the first to submit a bug that hadn't been recorded on Bug Guide yet. I thought that's what people have been calling 'state records'? Lol. So it actually means a record that has been checked and rechecked and found to have never, in the history of a particular state, been recorded before? If so, those records are a lot more prestigious than I had originally thought! :) Sorry about the mix-up. (Hmm...so if it's something never before recorded, does that actually mean a 'new species'?)
…
Mandy Howe
, 2 December, 2009 - 8:21pm
login
or
register
to post comments
I suppose
it's up to the individuals. I'd have to check their pages to be sure. After 5 years, I have one confirmed state record (meaning the specimen was collected, confirmed and is on file at a university).
…
Lynette Elliott
, 2 December, 2009 - 8:55pm
login
or
register
to post comments
I don't mean to pry...
...but was your record that cool dirt-colored seed bug on your page? Or something else?
…
Mandy Howe
, 2 December, 2009 - 9:29pm
login
or
register
to post comments
No
Unfortunately I released that bug before finding out it may be a new species. My state record is a carpet beetle. You can see it
here
.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 3 December, 2009 - 9:21am
login
or
register
to post comments
Neat!
Sorry for all the questions...I'm just a curious person. So was that beetle a new species? Or was it a larger than normal one? I read all the comments but I guess I didn't really understand what was going on.
…
Mandy Howe
, 3 December, 2009 - 11:45pm
login
or
register
to post comments
State Record
It was the first time it had been recorded in the state of MT. It has been recorded in Idaho, and I'm not sure what other states.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 4 December, 2009 - 9:44am
login
or
register
to post comments
This has all been super excit
This has all been super exciting! I so happy to get the ID for my image, and to contribute a new spider photo to BugGuide. Thanks for all of your help!
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 2 December, 2009 - 8:11pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Disregard that, Karen
Looks like Lynette created a good cropped copy...which worked well enough for Rod to see. Yay! I already know what he said (I got a CC of the email)...but I'm going to hold you all in suspense and let Lynette break the news. Haha! :)
…
Mandy Howe
, 1 December, 2009 - 3:26am
login
or
register
to post comments
larger version sent
Though I don't know if it will be big enough. I copied the original from above, cropped it and emailed it to Rod a few minutes ago.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 30 November, 2009 - 10:53pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Cool!
Can't wait to hear what he says!
…
Mandy Howe
, 30 November, 2009 - 11:02pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Me, too.
This is all very interesting.
…
John Sloan
, 30 November, 2009 - 11:14pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
ID Request
.
…
v belov
, 28 November, 2009 - 3:42pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Hmm
I'm not sure where to start on this one. Could be a female
Lycosid
of some kind. I think I am seeing two large, front facing eyes? It looks sort of primitive, but I not sure what it is. Hopefully someone will know about it based on its high elevation habitat.
…
Mandy Howe
, 21 November, 2009 - 12:40pm
login
or
register
to post comments
It looks like a lycosid to me
It looks like a lycosid to me, too. Did you collect it, by any chance?
…
John Sloan
, 21 November, 2009 - 11:43pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Thanks for your replies. No,
Thanks for your replies. No, I didn't collect it. Just enjoyed watching it! ;-)
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 22 November, 2009 - 12:25am
login
or
register
to post comments
Any other angles?
Did you take any other shots? The eyes here are the key. The do look wolf spider-like, but are a little closer together than most wolf spiders I'm used to seeing.
…
Lynette Elliott
, 22 November, 2009 - 10:30am
login
or
register
to post comments
Those long palps
look strange too - very interesting!
…
john and jane balaban
, 28 November, 2009 - 4:58pm
login
or
register
to post comments
I wish I could have taken mor
I wish I could have taken more at different angles, but was not able to on that narrow slippery trail.
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 22 November, 2009 - 11:58am
login
or
register
to post comments
Pardosa very common in Alberta
I just read
here
that
Pardosa
wolf spiders are the most common
Lycosids
in Alberta...making up about half of all the wolf spider population in the province. I have never read anything else from this source before, so I can't speak for its validity... but prior to reading it, I was thinking this spider might be an adult female
Pardosa
species that Bug Guide doesn't have yet. (?)
…
Mandy Howe
, 28 November, 2009 - 9:11pm
login
or
register
to post comments
I saw that article, and the p
I saw that article, and the picture of that thin legged Wolf spider doesn't look like this one... are there others?
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 28 November, 2009 - 10:19pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Yes, there's LOTS of Pardosa
That photo was just one example of a
Pardosa
. I was mainly just linking to that site because of the text where it said
Pardosa
are the most common wolf spider in Alberta. But technically,
Pardosa
are one of the five largest genera in the world anyways, so I guess that link was unnecessary (or redundant). Thin-legged wolf spiders are all in the genus
Pardosa
, which contains at least 45 separate species in Canada and Alaska. There are many more species in the US (about 70) and around 350 species worldwide. These
Pardosa
spiders are divided into 'groups' (
Pardosa
'moesta group' for example). You can see the groups that Bug Guide currently has
here
. There are currently 14 species groups in the United States, only 8 of them are currently represented on Bug Guide. I am really intrigued by your spider and would like to look into it more. Some days I have more time than others...but I will get to it soon I hope.
…
Mandy Howe
, 28 November, 2009 - 11:30pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Thank you so much for the lin
Thank you so much for the links and the wonderful information! I am so glad to know there are so many different wolf spiders. They are really cool critters! I really regret not trying to get better images of that one, but I did the best I could at the time...
…
Karen Zimmerman
, 28 November, 2009 - 11:34pm
login
or
register
to post comments
No problem
I enjoy this kind of thing! That was just one genus of wolf spider, too. There are soooo many more. No worries about getting more photos. We may not be able to ID her, but we can at least have fun trying. :)
…
Mandy Howe
, 29 November, 2009 - 12:12am
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.