Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Discussion of 2018 gathering

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Photos of insects and people from the 2014 gathering in Virginia, June 4-7.

Photos of insects and people from the 2013 gathering in Arizona, July 25-28

Photos of insects and people from the 2012 gathering in Alabama

Photos of insects and people from the 2011 gathering in Iowa

Photos from the 2010 Workshop in Grinnell, Iowa

Photos from the 2009 gathering in Washington

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#3579
Wolf Spider - Allocosa - female

Wolf Spider - Allocosa - Female
Marblehead, Massachusetts, USA
May 4, 2002
dorsum of the female

Moved
Moved from Wolf Spiders.

 
reasons for move?
What are the characteristics that distinguish Allocosa from related genera?

 
The
small size, black shiny carapace, abdominal color/pattern, and leg coloration, which are all characteristics of at least one common species in the genus.

 
Thanks
I've added some info to the genus page for future reference.

Moved
Moved from True Spiders.

 
Jeff, what do you think about
and ? We have always felt that all these are likely the same genus.

Identity?
Tom, Jeff Hollenbeck feels these are not Pardosa, but is not certain in which genus to place them. Any thoughts on where they belong?

 
Pardosas
I was thinking Pardosas because of small size. If not that, then I have no idea. Pardosas may not have contrast in the legs but I am no authority here.

 
Hey tom, Why is this image fr
Hey tom, Why is this image frassed? It's a larger image then mine and hopefully can be identified once we get a spider person to look over our guide pages. Actually I noticed your image because it looks a lot like mine..


 
Definitely
The same species. I don't know who frassed it but whoever it was, that person(s) should be reprimanded.

 
Interesting
I found this image when I was looking to see why some of my images had been frassed with no comment.

Check out this thread in the forums if you have a chance

http://bugguide.net/node/view/64257

The only thing I can possiblly think of for frassing was becuse the image was at 1600 pixel width, maybe they replaced it with a smaller version, or thought the image was too big for the guide? Even still they should have commented as such.

 
image un-Frassed
I don't know who moved this to Frass but I agree it shouldn't have been put there because it's a good image, and probably identifiable at least to genus by someone who has good knowledge of spiders (not me). So I moved it just now from Frass to the Araneomorphae page because of Tom's and Gehan's comments that it looked similar to Gehan's photo and is probably the same species.

If someone wants to move this photo again, I hope that he or she is courteous enough to tell all of us why it is being moved.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.