Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#371516
Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - female

Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - Female
Coyote Point County Park, San Mateo County, California, USA
February 13, 2010
Size: 6 mm
I found this adult female lycosid running across a trail near a marsh and the SF Bay. Appears to be a Pardosa sp. and I think P. ramulosa is the best match in terms of location and epigynum.

Images of this individual: tag all
Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - female Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - female Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - female Pardosa cf. ramulosa - Pardosa ramulosa - female

Specimen -
KRS-2010-37

Moved
Moved from Thinlegged Wolf Spiders.

Comment from Dr. Vogel:
"This picture isn't as nice as the P. californica but the beast is probably identified correctly... The guide doesn't name the identifier of P. ramulosa, but it is ok to call it that. I am not sure P. ramulosa isn't the same as P. sternalis, but there is a gap in the range of the beastie, and so far we call the western one P.ramulosa".

Dr. Vogel didn't mention tuoba in her comment and I'm reluctant to bug her more with questions about these images... I'm moving to the species level for now, with the understanding that this is a difficult species group to ID and we don't have absolute certainty here...

 
..
Sounds good to me! (What does she mean by "the guide doesn't name the identifier of P. ramulosa"? I can't figure out what the context is -- BugGuide? And what might the "identifier" be -- the person who made the identification?)

 
Yes -
I'm not sure, but I believe she was trying to figure out the Bug Guide structure. Perhaps she meant the author of the species?

And/or ask RC?
Rod C. might be able to help -- he's collected specimens of P. ramulosa (they're in his collecting journal).

-K

Greenstone
Perhaps I've answered my own question. This is from a paper (1980) by Greenstone:

"Salt- and freshwater marshes are, without exception, inhabited exclusively by Pardosa ramulosa, which is also found on the margins of the small pipe-fed and vernal pools in Point Pinole and Tilden Regional parks but not at the spring in Coyote Hills Regional Park. Pardosa tuoba is never found outside the prairie and scrub habitats, although it is conspicuously absent from Neil's Island, which contains large areas of typical coastal prairie."

"The salient difference between the habitat distributions of these two species is the presence of open standing water in all Pardosa ramulosa habitats and its absence from most P. tuoba habitats.... P. ramulosa's association with open standing water reflects specialization in foraging mode, the spiders hunting preferentially at the surface film of small bodies of standing water."

-K

 
Thanks, Kevin!
for that reference - I'll have to take a look at the whole article. I think that Vogel's paper says that the epigyna can separate the two also, and I thought this fit ramulosa better - see p. 102 of the 2004 Vogel revision. I've emailed Dr. Vogel to see if she'd be willing to look at these images to confirm...

 
..
For P. tuoba she writes that "females can be identiļ¬ed by the basal portion of the septum which is wide enough to nearly cover the cavities".

And in the key for P. tuoba: "Median septum rectangular and nearly covering cavities".

But isn't that what we see in the image -- a broad median septum that is wide enough to nearly cover the cavities? Well, as you can tell, I'm not sure what it is I see. You've got the advantage of being there.

Signed,

Confused in Berlin :-)

 
Well -
I'm not sure I'm correct, but I see (under the scope, even if the pic isn't great) that the posterior end of the septum (the basal portion, I believe) is about as narrow as the rest of the septum - it doesn't stand out well in the pic, but if you look closely, you can see two round cavities flanking the base of the septum...

 
..
I superimposed Vogel's drawings of the two species on your image. Not sure if that solves the dilemma, but the result is interesting to look at: http://forum.canadianarachnology.org/viewtopic.php?p=3156

BTW, I'm perfectly happy with "Pardosa cf. ramulosa". It will be interesting to see if anyone with more experience can give us a definitive answer.

-K

Hi Ken, I've only looked v
Hi Ken,

I've only looked very briefly at Vogel, 2004, so far. Have you already excluded P. tuoba? (California, under 500 m)

-K

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.