Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

National Moth Week was July 23-31, 2022! See moth submissions.

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29

Photos of insects and people from the 2015 gathering in Wisconsin, July 10-12

Previous events

Tricolored Acrobasis - Acrobasis suavella

Tricolored Acrobasis - Acrobasis suavella
Port Alberni, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
August 3, 2010
AVBC BOLD DNA Species match made. DNA confirmation also made for 5 other specimens.

Moved to Acrobasis suavella
Moved from Tricolored Acrobasis Moth.

I believe that your 3 specimens at BOLD, which are placed in BIN BOLD:AAH4680, refer to A. suavella, (Zincken, 1818), samples AVBC 527-10 (above); AVBC 490-10 and AVBC 569-10. BOLD:AAH4680 is the BIN for this European species which was apparently introduced in Vancouver. Your specimens in BOLD:ABZ1808 appear to be correct for A. tricolorella but I should point out that what we are calling that species may be a complex with more than one species based on what I see at BOLD.

The most obvious difference I see it the pm. line being less jagged than in A. tricolorella . It would be great if you could submit AVBC 569-10 which shows this more clearly. May I use that at MPG?

Thanks, Steve!
Appreciate you letting me know all this. We get what I was assuming to be A. tricolorella fairly often. Will take a closer look at them from now on - I see what you mean about the PM line.

Have attached the photo of AV 569-10:

You're very welcome to use it for MPG.
(That goes for any other of our photos which might be useful. Bob Patterson asked for permission years ago & I just assumed it had continued on with you. You're doing a great job on MPG!)

Thank You
Thanks! I added the image. And thanks for the encouragement.

I only asked about the permission because it was on BOLD. I assume BugGuide images were OK to use for all MPG contributors but wasn't sure about BOLD. Also, I was confident that you had taken the photo but many images are photographed at BOLD so the copyright can be an issue.

There's a bunch of other misidentified suavella taken from the Vancouver area in that same BIN at BOLD. I notified them and hopefully it will all get checked and corrected.

I just went on the BOLD site and changed our three ID's to suavella.

With regard to MPG generally, we live in a fairly small town & it makes such a difference to have access to a site like this and the expertise that goes along with it. My three first "go to" spots for moths are MPG, Bug Guide and the Pacific Northwest Moth site. When I first started Bob Patterson was so helpful, patiently explaining what were pretty basic questions - couldn't have have made nearly as much without him.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.