Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2024
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera)
»
Pyralid and Crambid Snout Moths (Pyraloidea)
»
Pyralid Moths (Pyralidae)
»
Phycitinae
»
Phycitini
»
Acrobasis Group
»
Acrobasis
»
Acrobasis suavella - Hodges#5702 (Acrobasis suavella)
Photo#493464
Copyright © 2011
Libby & Rick Avis
Tricolored Acrobasis -
Acrobasis suavella
Port Alberni, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
August 3, 2010
AVBC BOLD DNA Species match made. DNA confirmation also made for 5 other specimens.
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Libby & Rick Avis
on 26 February, 2011 - 11:08pm
Last updated 8 September, 2018 - 5:21am
Moved to Acrobasis suavella
Moved from
Tricolored Acrobasis Moth
.
I believe that your 3 specimens at BOLD, which are placed in BIN BOLD:AAH4680, refer to
A. suavella
, (Zincken, 1818), samples AVBC 527-10 (above); AVBC 490-10 and AVBC 569-10. BOLD:AAH4680 is the BIN for this European species which was apparently introduced in Vancouver. Your specimens in BOLD:ABZ1808 appear to be correct for
A. tricolorella
but I should point out that what we are calling that species may be a complex with more than one species based on what I see at BOLD.
The most obvious difference I see it the pm. line being less jagged than in
A. tricolorella
. It would be great if you could submit AVBC 569-10 which shows this more clearly. May I use that at MPG?
…
Steve Nanz
, 8 September, 2018 - 5:21am
login
or
register
to post comments
Thanks, Steve!
Appreciate you letting me know all this. We get what I was assuming to be A. tricolorella fairly often. Will take a closer look at them from now on - I see what you mean about the PM line.
Have attached the photo of AV 569-10:
You're very welcome to use it for MPG.
(That goes for any other of our photos which might be useful. Bob Patterson asked for permission years ago & I just assumed it had continued on with you. You're doing a great job on MPG!)
…
Libby & Rick Avis
, 8 September, 2018 - 12:45pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Thank You
Thanks! I added the image. And thanks for the encouragement.
I only asked about the permission because it was on BOLD. I assume BugGuide images were OK to use for all MPG contributors but wasn't sure about BOLD. Also, I was confident that you had taken the photo but many images are photographed at BOLD so the copyright can be an issue.
There's a bunch of other misidentified
suavella
taken from the Vancouver area in that same BIN at BOLD. I notified them and hopefully it will all get checked and corrected.
…
Steve Nanz
, 8 September, 2018 - 1:49pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Ok.
I just went on the BOLD site and changed our three ID's to suavella.
With regard to MPG generally, we live in a fairly small town & it makes such a difference to have access to a site like this and the expertise that goes along with it. My three first "go to" spots for moths are MPG, Bug Guide and the Pacific Northwest Moth site. When I first started Bob Patterson was so helpful, patiently explaining what were pretty basic questions - couldn't have have made nearly as much without him.
…
Libby & Rick Avis
, 8 September, 2018 - 2:41pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.