Unfortunately, I have no date for this specimen.

Having some difficulty deciding on this Anisodactylus, between agricola Say vs. kirbyi Lindroth.

Characters: uniform dark color; front tibial spur not tridentate though swollen basally; mandibles not prolonged; hind tarsi longer, first segment longer than spur; distinct hind angles of pronotum, noticeably dentate; clypeus with one setigerous puncture on each side. This leads to the decision between A. agricola and A. kirbyi. I've had this ID'd as A. agricola but looking at it a second time I'm not as sure.

Supporting kirbyi: basal impressions of pronotum seem to have a slight linear shape anteriorly; short setae present dorsally on first two hind tarsomeres; hind angles more markedly toothed, which matches better with illustrations in Lindroth.

Supporting agricola: elytra do not seem noticeably dull and intervals not noticeably punctate; elytra broader behind middle; short metasternum (Lindroth notes that "This is the only species of Anisodactylus with wings so small, though reflexed at tip, that they must be regarded as non-functionary."; compared to the other Anisodactylus in my collection, the metasternum to metacoxal ratio is noticeably smaller in this specimen, which is a common external feature of reduced wing species).