Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#618177
Trogositidae? - Macrohydnobius simulator

Trogositidae? - Macrohydnobius simulator
Keller, Ferry County, Washington, USA
January 14, 2012
Size: 4.7mm
Found on snow

Images of this individual: tag all
Trogositidae? - Macrohydnobius simulator Trogositidae? - Macrohydnobius simulator Trogositidae? - Macrohydnobius simulator Macrohydnobius protibial spur - Macrohydnobius simulator Macrohydnobius protibial spur - Macrohydnobius simulator

ID confirmed by S.B. Peck: Macrohydnobius simulator female

Moved tentatively; neat beast.
i would like this confirmed; could you pls key it out? i'll gladly share a pdf copy, just let me know.
Moved from Sogdini.

 
Macrohydnobius
I tentatively keyed this creature out as M. mathewsii as follows:
1. Protibial spurs enlarged, elongate....2
2. Without a tooth on outer margin of left mandible....3
3'. Elongate protibial spur inserted at or near base. Elytral punctures were all of the same size....4
4. I am not sure how to sex small beetles. Do the genitalia have to be dissected out? If so, how would this be done? I wasn't able to use the key to separate M. matthewsi from M. crestonensis based on male genitalia. So I compared the posterior shapes of sternite 8, ventral view (Figs. 105 and 120). The shape of sternite 8, ventral view, in this specimen is not dished in as in fig. 120, but rather evenly truncate as in fig. 105. Also, the protibial spur resembled Fig. 103 rather than Fig. 118.
Any advice on finding the genitalia?

 
sexing-wise, small ones are no different from any other animals
i.e., if the sexes are dimorphic (like in this case), there is no problem; if they aren't, dissection would be the only way --other than observing mating pairs, that is.
please see Peck & Cook (2009) p.37: "outer margin of male protibia prolonged beyond base of tarsi; male protibia with elongate, sinuate apical spur..."
i was unable to see enough leg on your pics, and my tentative ID was based primarily on the mandibular morphology; moreover, M. simulator gals are apparently the darkest ones (couplet 9)

 
Macrohydnobius protibial spur
I've added two images showing the protibial apical spur. It looks shallowly curved rather than sinuate. Do you think this would be an issue, or would it fall within natural variability for the species?
Thanks
Joe

 
thanx; the leg confirms it's a female

 
Thanks

 
Sogdini
Sure I'll key it out. Please do send me the pdf copy.

 
sent; enjoy...
...like i enjoy seeing your fine work on BG!

 
thanks
I really do appreciate your regard for the photography I submit. Getting involved with BG has motivated me to work on improving my insect photography. Thanks for your kind feedback!

nice! these are typical winter-active leiodines
use the key in(1)
Moved from ID Request.

 
Leiodidae
Thanks

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.