Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar
Upcoming Events

Photos of insects and people from the 2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho July 24-27

Moth submissions from National Moth Week 2024

Photos of insects and people from the 2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico, July 20-24

Photos of insects and people from the Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana, April 28-May 2

Photos of insects and people from the 2019 gathering in Louisiana, July 25-27

Photos of insects and people from the 2018 gathering in Virginia, July 27-29


Previous events


TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#637623
small buprestid - Acmaeodera neoneglecta

small buprestid - Acmaeodera neoneglecta
Sabal Palm Audubon Sanctuary, Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas, USA
April 13, 2012
The Opuntia cactus flowers had many of these inside.

Images of this individual: tag all
small buprestid - Acmaeodera neoneglecta small buprestid - Acmaeodera neoneglecta

Moved

I can definitively say morpho
I can definitively say morphologically this is NOT Acmaeodera neglecta. It Is Acmaeodera neoneglecta.

Moved
Moved from Acmaeodera.

i'd say, keep it
at some point we might want to make pages to accommodate images that cannot be ID'd to species but can be sorted to informal species groups -- i expect such pages to be useful and educational.
at any rate, we can afford keeping some extra ballast in a genus this huge; after all, we have just over 750 pics per ~85 identified spp. (and ~60 spp. to go!) --nothing exactly extravagant.
[ugh... statements like this one don't make it easier to uphold my frass-happy reputation... losing my grip, i guess]

 
Good idea..
I agree; it certainly cannot hurt. However, there can be a problem in defining a species group. :-) So, is this in the "tubulus group or the neglecta group, or are they "congroupic"? Do we need "subgroups"? Come on, Ted...weigh in! :-)

Moved

 
Identification
In my opinion moving it to the genus is about all we can do without seeing the specimen, preferably a series of specimens. From the locality we might deduce this is A. neoneglecta; however, this is a difficult taxonomic group at best, and having to ID from images alone puts it into the category of a nightmare!

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.