Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#66496
Bug - Ozophora occidentalis

Bug - Ozophora occidentalis
Encino, Los Angeles County, California, USA
July 23, 2006
Size: 1/4 inch
Came to blacklight

seems to fit O. occidentalis better
Moved from Ozophora depicturata.

Compared to Ozophora depicturata, this specimen has
-narrower band on antennomere IV
-shorter legs and antennae
-shorter, broader pronotum

opinion of Merrill Sweet:
"Ozophora depicturata Barber, but Ozophora is difficult. Need to see the specimen to be sure"

Moved from Ozophora.

Moved

Moved
Moved from Seed Bugs.

Moved
Moved from True Bugs.

Not Miridae.
This is one of those seed bugs that I believe is now in a family other than Lygaeidae. Uniformly thick antennae are one clue it is not a mirid, but the lack of a cuneus is the defining character. These insects can be abundant at lights at night. Few mirids visit lights in any numbers.

 
Thanks Eric
Thanks Eric for setting me straight. I was mostly going on the lack of apparent ocelli (guess they're there somewhere) but I'll have to be sure at the same time to consider the presence or absence of a cuneus.

 
Thanks!
And just when I thought "Miridae" was going to be one of those all-purpose clichés on the order of "Tastes like chicken"...

Seriously, though: is it possible this is another Ozophora picturata:

 
Ozophora cf. picturata -- seconded
*

Miridae
No ocelli that I can see
Looks like a Miridae

 
Thanks!
:)

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.