Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#665400
Broken-line Hypenodes - Hypenodes fractilinea

Broken-line Hypenodes - Hypenodes fractilinea
George Sims Place, Douglas County, Missouri, USA
April 28, 2012
Size: 1/2" at most
Came to blacklight at night. Not at all sure bout this one, I'm all over the place, from a Twirler, Pyralid, Phycitine, Crambid, or Pyraustine Moth. See what I mean? Any way you could straighten me out on this one?

Images of this individual: tag all
Broken-line Hypenodes - Hypenodes fractilinea Broken-line Hypenodes - Hypenodes fractilinea

Moved
Moved from Hypenodes.

 
O.K.
I recently added what I ID'd as another Hypenodes fractilinea here in Boone Co, MO It looks like Moths with this appearance are being ID'd and posted there. Can you tell me what distinguishes this as n. sp.? And what do you think about the other one I just added: http://bugguide.net/node/view/1193222 ?

Thanks!

 
--
You can leave it here if you want. I really don't know what species they are in and that is why I prefer leaving them at the genus level. Same for you other image. I don't know what that one is and I don't know if it is even the same species as the one above.

Smith's original description can be found here. If you read that description and apply it to BOLD Sample ID: 1718-COI-07, I think you'll find it's a reasonable match. The am. line is not reduced to 3 dots; the pm. line is darkly shaded toward the base and followed by pale scales which is different from you example above. The shape of the pm. line is very different. There are examples shown at BOLD under fractilinea which do look more like your example but it does not look like they were barcoded. If I had to guess, I say they are not that species but that's just speculations.

Many people are placing there look-a-likes here so a couple more won't hurt though again, I think genus would be better.

 
Thanks Steve!
for your information. I also searched FB Moths of Eastern U.S. and there is some mention of undescribed species. So I'm not clear either. It does look like many are being called fractilinea, or at least placed there, until we have further good info.

 
Why?
Why the move? Hypenodes n. sp. 1 still looks just as good to me.

The name of the species is a place holder by BOLD. It does represent a potentially undescribed species. The DNA test is indicating that the distance to its nearest neighbor, Hypenodes n. sp. 4, is ~4.5% which in turn is ~2.5% from Hypenodes fractilinea.

Moved
Moved from Broken-line Hypenodes.

See info on Mark's nearly identical submission here. Since I don't understand it, I am moving it to genus.

 
Thanks Steve!
I saw this n sp one other time and I think, but am not sure that it means it is identifiable to species, but is not named yet (or have an agreed-upon species name).

Moved
Moved from Moths.

8421 – Hypenodes fractilinea
This looks like 8421 – Hypenodes fractilinea and no, I can't straighten you out on this. I just happen to remember it. I'd have gone through the same thing as you had I not remembered.

Moved
Moved from ID Request.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.