Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#72732
chrysalis - Battus philenor

chrysalis - Battus philenor
Pima Canyon, Santa Catalina Mts., Pima County, Arizona, USA
August 23, 2006
Size: 45mm
From the guide, this most resembles Pipevine Swallowtail. There were Pipevine adults and larvae about, but also other swallowtails plus Gulf Fritillaries, and Queens. Can anyone tell from the chrysalis? Wish it were a sharper image; it was a beautiful chrysalis.

shaped like B. philenor
not like B. polydamas. In particular look at the shape of the projections on the abdomen and thorax. Color is variable, and most Swallowtail species have green and brown form pupae.

Moved from Battus.

 
Good tip
- for guide purposes, can you put into words the difference you see in the shape of projections? Seems to me they curve in more towards the tail end in B. polydamas, and are more straight out in B. philenor - is that what you mean?

 
I think we're seeing the same thing
Hard to put such things into a few words, but in B. philenor the flattened projections on the abdomen seem to be more evenly and equally shapped, with the two side edges about equal in length, almost rectangular if not for the fairly evenly rounded top edge. The "nose" (really a projection on the back of the thorax) is somewhat shorter and rounder, sticking out usually straighter. On B. polydamus the abdominal projections are all more asymmetric in shape, the first pair almost triangular, with each pair is different in shape from the other pairs. They are less rounded on the outer side. The "nose" projection is longer and more pointed looking, more prominent, tending to lean "down" toward the abdomen a bit. There are other subtle differences in appearance, probably having to do with posture and proportions of the body, that are hard to quantify, and that change somewhat as you change the angle of viewing, so are not very useful for photos anyway.

 
Thanks
I've put this as a thumbnail on the guide page - please don't frass.

Moved
Moved from Butterflies and Moths. At thew very least, we know this is Battus.

Hmmm
to me it looks a lot like the green form of Battus polydamas (below), which I think is also possible, given your location.


 
Wow
your pic looks just like it. Problem is, I've never seen B. polydamas and in Butterflies of Southeastern Arizona (Bailowitz and Brock, 1991) it is listed as "hypothetical." Somewhat dated reference. Maybe they've been recorded since, but don't imagine very often. Anyway, I'll be on the lookout when in Pima Canyon from now on. Pipevines on the other hand are in my opinion the most ubiquitous swallowtail in SE AZ. Wonder how close that congener's chrysalis is to the above? Thanks for the suggestion.

 
Compare:

 
Color is the most variable feature of chrysalids
so it's quite possible this is B. philenor - I found an image on the web here that looks more like yours, though the ones already in the guide do not resemble yours so closely as the green B. polydamas one does. According to the map at BMNA, there are confirmed records of B. polydamas from at least part of SE Arizona.

I think you're safe in calling this Battus, at least! :)

 
Thanks
Hannah, I'll be on the lookout for B. polydamas. Would love to see one.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.