Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2024
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Beetles (Coleoptera)
»
Polyphaga
»
Series Cucujiformia
»
Longhorn and Leaf Beetles (Chrysomeloidea)
»
Longhorn Beetles (Cerambycidae)
»
Flat-faced Longhorn Beetles (Lamiinae)
»
Monochamini
»
Goes
»
Oak sapling borer (Goes tesselatus)
Photo#72934
Copyright © 2006
Daniel Swofford
Longhorn Beetle -
Goes tesselatus
Eastwood, Carter County, Missouri, USA
June 11, 2006
I think it's a
Goes tesselatus
, but a second opinion would sure be appreciated.
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Daniel Swofford
on 26 August, 2006 - 2:13am
Last updated 27 September, 2006 - 6:34pm
Moved
Moved from
Longhorned Beetles
. Agrees with Frank's image of this species.
…
Jim McClarin
, 27 September, 2006 - 6:34pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Beetles
.
…
Phillip Harpootlian
, 27 September, 2006 - 11:33am
login
or
register
to post comments
Or else Goes tum*ifrons,
but I think you are correct in that the pronotum does not appear to have much pubescence and tumi*frons is a much rarer beetle. The best indication would be whether you recall seeing any alternating gray and yellowish stripes of fine elytral pubescence that is most noticeable viewed from the posterior. If you noticed these, then it's tesselatus for sure since on tumi*frons the fine pubescence is uniform.
Although both species in this case are about the same size, it is generally helpful to give some size indication, preferably in millimeters.
…
Jim McClarin
, 26 August, 2006 - 7:06am
login
or
register
to post comments
Hi Jim
tumifrons
was my other choice, but the color patterns on
tesselatus
looked closer after staring at the photos for a half an hour. I don't recall seeing any stripes, but he was deep in a stand of oak sprouts and this was the only view I got since I didn't want to spook him.
I usually try to give a size, especially if I can actually measure the specimen. But I didn't handle this one - only photographed him, it was over two months ago and I'm a lousy estimator anyway, so any size I gave would have just been a shot in the dark. I figured no size would be better than an inaccurate one. Sorry.
…
Daniel Swofford
, 26 August, 2006 - 11:18am
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.