Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Clickable Guide
Moths Butterflies Flies Caterpillars Flies Dragonflies Flies Mantids Cockroaches Bees and Wasps Walkingsticks Earwigs Ants Termites Hoppers and Kin Hoppers and Kin Beetles True Bugs Fleas Grasshoppers and Kin Ticks Spiders Scorpions Centipedes Millipedes

Calendar

TaxonomyBrowseInfoImagesLinksBooksData
Photo#955770
Shining Fungus Beetle - Baeocera falsata

Shining Fungus Beetle - Baeocera falsata
Groton, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA
July 11, 2014
Size: 2.5mm

Images of this individual: tag all
Shining Fungus Beetle - Baeocera falsata Shining Fungus Beetle - Baeocera falsata Shining Fungus Beetle - Baeocera falsata

excellent -- thanks Don
Moved from Baeocera.

Baeocera falsata
it is. A measured 2.5 mm (not as big as was rumored), but certainly among the biggies for Baeocera. Fortunately it keys out well before the series of species where the male genitalia are required in Loebl and Stephan's revision.

Moved tentatively; indeed, large Baeocera of this gestalt...
...are quite common in E. Asia; i'm very curious to see the vouchered ID

Moved from Scaphisomatini.

Moved

This is definitely Scaphisoma
This is definitely Scaphisomatini, I think the pronotum in this case has a lobe covering the scutellum, and thus appears as a scutellum. Probably one of the more chunky Baeocera species.

Cheers,
Adam

why not?
Scaphidium piceum. It is the only large, black species in our area.

 
Scaphidium all have characteristic coarse puctures ...
...along both the pronotal and elytral bases and conspicuously clavate antennae; their body is not flattened like here and differs in the outline, too

stunned... a bit dark but i think i can see the scutellum
...which kinda rules out Scaphisomatini.
my first instinct was, Cyparium -- but the antenna looks too long and slender for that one, not to mention the fact there aren't any in the Northeast...
what am i missing? curious about size, too -- seems quite hefty.
dying to hear from colleagues.

 
more pics added
I didn't measure it, but I'd say it was close to 5mm. I found it on the trunk of a black birch tree, and it never moved fast like most of these guys do.

 
close to 5 mm is exactly what it looks to me
good news, 'cuz it confirms it's not a scaphisomatine
would you show it to Don and Adam? without prejudice to any third-party preemptive right that may exist, that is ))))

 
emails sent
Hopefully the pictures are enough to get further with this ID. If not I'll see where the specimen should go.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.