Identification, Images, & Information
For Insects, Spiders & Their Kin
For the United States & Canada
Register
·
Log In
Home
Guide
ID Request
Recent
Frass
Forums
Donate
Help
Clickable Guide
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Registration
is open for the
2024 BugGuide gathering in Idaho
July 24-27
Moth submissions
from
National Moth Week 2023
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2022 BugGuide gathering in New Mexico
, July 20-24
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
Spring 2021 gathering in Louisiana
, April 28-May 2
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2019 gathering in Louisiana
, July 25-27
Photos of
insects
and
people
from the
2018 gathering in Virginia
, July 27-29
Previous events
Taxonomy
Browse
Info
Images
Links
Books
Data
Home
» Guide »
Arthropods (Arthropoda)
»
Hexapods (Hexapoda)
»
Insects (Insecta)
»
Flies (Diptera)
»
"Acalyptratae"
»
Sciomyzoidea
»
Thick-headed Flies (Conopidae)
»
Conopinae
»
Physoconops
»
Subgenus Pachyconops (Physoconops Subgenus Pachyconops)
Photo#998448
Copyright © 2014
Robert A. Behrstock
Physoconops
-
Hereford, W of Hwy. 92, lower Ash Canyon, Cochise County, Arizona, USA
September 18, 2014
Facial area and cheeks rather uniform gray; first and second antennal segments approximately equal length.
Images of this individual:
tag all
tag
·
login
or
register
to post comments
Contributed by
Robert A. Behrstock
on 19 September, 2014 - 1:57pm
Last updated 20 September, 2014 - 4:31pm
Cheek Spot
The female here seems to lack the dark (blackish) cheek spot, which is unmistakably present in the male of the companion post below:
But the viewing angle for seeing the cheek spot can be tricky. Sometimes the subtle curvature of the rear-lower portion of the cheek can be such that an oblique frontal view (like the one in the shot above)...though seeming to expose the entire cheek to view...actually has the lower-rear part of the cheek obscured. The ideal viewing angle for checking the cheek spot is usually a "straight-on" transverse profile, taken from slightly below. But...all that said...it looks like you did get most the female's right cheek in this image, and no obvious dark spot is visible. (Although, curiously, there's a bit of dark on the opposite side of the face in the parafacial area...perhaps that's a flash artifact shadow? It seems there's no such spot symmetrically matching it on the fly's right parafacial.)
If the two posts are indeed male and female of the same species (and the dark cheek mark isn't "present but obscured" here), then that would be very surprising...since the cheek spot character has been thought to be a stable, dependable diagnostic of species discrimination in Conopinae for quite a while, and its presence or absence is usually the same for males and females of a given species.
…
Aaron Schusteff
, 21 September, 2014 - 1:30pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Moved
Moved from
Conopinae
.
…
Aaron Schusteff
, 20 September, 2014 - 4:32pm
login
or
register
to post comments
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsed
Flat list - expanded
Threaded list - collapsed
Threaded list - expanded
Date - newest first
Date - oldest first
10 comments per page
30 comments per page
50 comments per page
70 comments per page
90 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.